Campbell: New Apple mini server not a big deal

| More

published: Mon, 9 Nov, 2009

Small is big in technology right now, which is why Apple recently announced the creation of a server version of the Apple mini.

Apparently, Apple’s thought process was, “If people want desktops and laptops to be on the small side, why wouldn’t they want to create a home or office network using a miniature server?”

The server boasts the Apple OS X Snow Leopard Server and allows customers to connect Windows and Macintosh computers in an office or home environment to make ordinary server services quickly and easily available.

The mini targets small businesses that wish to revamp their computing infrastructure, but the mini might find itself lost in a limbo of uselessness.

OS X Snow Leopard Server provides additional features to allow quick and easy networking, as well as hosting some services that are vital to the ordinary business.

The mini server can easily be set up to run a web host and host an intranet site, run an e-mail server application that provides in-house e-mail communication and behave as a file server to provide a central file repository in which office computers connect.

The new mini comes with the same dual-core processor and memory available in its $799 non-server mini brother, and instead of having an optical drive, it has two preconfigured 500-GB hard drives.

A server usually becomes necessary when a substantial population of people begins using a network and wishes to collaborate without shouting across a room.

Many organizations distribute server-esque tasks across multiple computers that were never designed to be servers. Apple said it hopes that these organizations will embrace a server revolution and buy mini servers en masse.

Depending on the size of the organization, the mishmash of distributed computing services might be just fine, and a mini might be an unnecessary expense.

Take, for example, a small retail business. Apple mentions this type of business as one of the mini’s major targets on its website.

The proprietor owns several computers connected to cash registers, as well as a general purpose machine located in the back that runs Microsoft Office, contains some financial wizardry software and generally performs all of the everyday computer tasks.

The cash registers easily connect to the general purpose computer to register sales and record other financial transactions as they happen.

The office computer is therefore a server — part time. It’s a nice, clean setup that is relatively simple to maintain.

Apple said it hopes that with the Mac mini server, the owner of that shop will add the server and centralize many of the business’ computing tasks.

The mini server will provide inventory lists, financial records and general file hosting. Because it is small and runs Apple’s user-friendly software, it should be why the mini is chosen over all other entry-level server offerings.

For larger organizations that have the technical support capacity and the finances to handle it, the mini is an attractive idea.
Dedicated servers are generally more reliable, as they are not subject to the errors, crashes and security issues of general purpose machines.

There are some concerns with the mini server, however. The mini might not have a place in the world of servers.

The mini’s major advantages are its size and easy configuration.

Its disadvantages are that for many small businesses, its existence is unnecessary, its price is $999 and it is no more powerful than the $799 ordinary mini.

For organizations that could legitimately benefit from a server, the price of $999 is a little steep for what they get.

Those businesses wish to have a server but have the support to integrate a more hardcore server running Linux or Windows, and they don’t care about machine space requirements.

A $600 or $700 Dell PowerEdge server could more efficiently meet their server needs.

For the remaining, possibly not-so-small businesses, the mini might not be powerful enough.

At a certain level of server requirements, a company would do best to buy a more powerful server. If the company is a loyal Apple customer, it should consider an Xserve.

The Apple mini server could therefore be a legitimate purchase for businesses with moderate computing requirements and deep concern that their servers be no bigger than a box of chocolates.

For the rest of the world, the mini server appears to be easily trounced by the Dell PowerEdges and HP servers available at surprisingly low costs.

Comments

Mac Mini Server in a Data Center

Another reason to use a mac mini server is cheap hosting. You can find mac mini colo for $30 per month at http://www.macminiworld.net/services.html.

Considering your only other option for a Apple native server is the $2999 XServe. I think the Mac Mini Server makes plenty of sense for both small and large businesses.

Expect Apple to continue to push into the server market with new versions of the XServe in coming years.


Concur with those that differ with your opinion

My business has a loaded x-serve. It is loud, makes lots of heat, but is a very good machine. A small business or home that doesn't want or have a climate controlled server closet, the mac mini server may do nicely. Despite Leopard Server's OS being relatively simple, it isn't for those that don't have a very good handle on the Mac OS or aren't willing to learn a lot about servers. I also have concerns about the two internal hard drives for storage. I believe some sort of external raid array attached to the mac mini would be a better way to go. If for some reason one of these drives goes down, it can be easily replaced where an internal drive means the server is down.

Seriously considering the purchase of a mac mini server for the home.


Well, I was excited

I have to differ. When I heard (or read) the news, I was excited. It's a great option to host a small webpage from a home (due to its small size and limited use of power).

Plus, many people have become fans of using multiple mac minis as servers. Google 'mac mini farm' to see what I mean. I think Apple is really responding to this idea.


I beg to differ on your pricing model

The cheapest Dell Edge Server with matching specs(Dual Core proc, 4 GB RAM, dual 500GB Drives and the ability to do RAID 1) is going to run you $1142 and that is without an Operating system


I beg to differ on your pricing model

I priced out the cheapest Dell server with matching specs and no operating system the price came out to $1142 vs. 999 for the Apple

Mac Mini Server Dell

HD 2X500 GB 2X500GB
RAM 2X2 GB DDR3 2X2 GB DDR2
Proc 2.53 GHZ Intel Core Duo 2.3 GHZ Dual Core AMD

The Dell needed an extra $199 to do RAID 1 the Apple does Raid 0 and RAID 1 off of the shelf


mac mini is a fabulous product for small businesses

I respectfully beg to disagree with the author in quite a few of his comments.

To mention the most obvious, the mac-mini is an extremely capable low end server for it's price. Given it's small form factor it consumes very little space in collocation hosting allowing you to have multiple servers for the price of one typical 1U or 2U server.

Dell power edge or HP servers will save you on CAPEX, but the mac-mini will save you several times more (literally) in OPEX for collocation hosting.


I have a new SLS Mini and

I have a new SLS Mini and love it. It is able to backup all the macs in the office, run scripts to process our data, runs our mail and web services, and most importantly provides a dead simple VPN solution so people can get to their data from home, I also use a softphone/headset to connect to our switch from home so I can make calls "from the office" from anywhere with a wifi connection. I think the wiki server will provide a solution to a few collaboration issues I am faced with, and will start looking into that later this week. With a bit more programming and configuring, this Mac Mini will replace everything in my server closet (except for the rack mount that is running asterisk for our phones). Six servers down to two, that will save me a ton in maintenance as well as a ton in power consumption. The other really nice thing is it runs headless and provides access through the command line, screen sharing or most of the server tools installed on my laptop so can keep it anywhere in the office and reach it from anywhere.


Cost depends on time

I'm a UNIX weenie but the ease of admin for the Mini Server seems a huge win. The ability to set up LDAP directory and other services with a nice Mac GUI will save me a bunch of time. Same for other server-ish services. It's also worth noting that the Server software is not limited to a tiny handful of clients (5 on the base) like equivalent, extra-cost software from Redmond.


Mac Mini Server is a good product for small businesses

Actually, the Windows servers are not as cheap as you think. The ones that you see with low prices are generally without the Windows server operating system. and when you include the server system, the price will easily doubled. Xserve is not suitable for small businesses because of the high cost and need an extra room to store the server due to higher fan noise of the server. In my opinion, this product should sell well in the small and home businesses market.

David,
http://www.coolmac.com.au


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options


CAPTCHA
Are you human? (we've been getting a lot of spam lately...)
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

Right Sidebar

MULTIMEDIA

Pittsburgh Pride Week


published: Mon, 21 Jun, 2010

 Pittsburgh's Pride March was held in Lawrenceville on June 13. The parade was the end of a week-long celebration for Pride Week. 


Cloudy with a chance of...


published: Wed, 16 Jun, 2010

 About 100 Pittsburghers gathered for the second Cinema in the Parks. Little did they know that the characters on screen wouldn't be the only ones running for dry ground. 





Centennial Celebration