Opinions

Editorial: PA ballot question doesn’t solve property tax problem

If you voted Tuesday in Pennsylvania’s election, you were presented with an interesting ballot question — should the state legislature allow local taxing authorities to exempt 100 percent of any family’s primary residence value when collecting taxes?

Pennsylvania voted yes by a margin of 54 to 46 percent, effectively taking the first step toward significant property tax reform. This would allow the legislature to write a law eliminating property taxes. But while eliminating the property tax could aid individual families in the short-term, the ballot question has the potential to seriously harm the long-term stability of the Commonwealth.

Public schools in Pennsylvania — a state known as the “Wild West” of property tax laws —  are among the most contentiously funded in the nation, which creates real problems. In fact, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently reinstated a controversial case that claims Pennsylvania’s system for funding public schools violates both the state constitution’s equal protection provision and its guarantee of a “thorough and efficient system” of education.

At the root of the public school funding issue in Pennsylvania is the property tax. According to The Notebook, a Philadelphia-based independent news source, the effective tax rate across Pennsylvania varies greatly by county with no discernible pattern and results in massive school funding disparities. To make matters worse, the average effective tax rate in Pennsylvania is one of the highest in the nation.

This means some counties have superb schools, while others have seriously underfunded ones — and in Pennsylvania this has little correlation to the type of neighborhood the school is in. Schools in socio-economically similar counties are vastly different — the Inquirer reported the city of Reading spent roughly $6,500 per pupil during the 2015-16 school year, compared to Lower Merion Township’s $17,000 per pupil. Reading and Lower Merion both have property tax rates in the top 20 percent across the state.

It’s clear Pennsylvania should be reforming its property tax laws — but the confusingly worded question on Tuesday’s ballot does not reform anything. All it does is give the Pennsylvania legislature incredible power to remove the single greatest source of education funding in the state.

And in light of the recently reinstated Supreme Court of Pennsylvania lawsuit, it’s clear we cannot trust the legislature to provide a fair and equal education funding system — even if property taxes are available to be spent.

Instead of granting broad power to the state legislature like we did Tuesday, we should be demanding detailed tax reform from the bottom up that ensures all Pennsylvania children receive equal education, regardless of the county their parents own property in.

opinionsdesk

Share
Published by
opinionsdesk

Recent Posts

Students hold sit-in protest in support of Palestinians, call on Pitt to divest

A coalition of student groups are staging a sit-in protest in front of the Cathedral…

4 hours ago

Chris Matthews: Inspiring language learners at home and abroad

Most people could never imagine themselves going grocery shopping in a foreign country with the…

1 day ago

Amy Flick: An advocate who makes sure her students ‘retain their dignity’

Amy Flick is a professor committed to bridging the gap between science and society. From…

1 day ago

The best cafés to caffeinate and cram for finals

The worst part about finals is to see your life dwindle away in the small…

1 day ago

Sarah Siddiqui: Bolstering wellness on Pitt’s Student Government Board

Student Government Board’s office is filled with colorful Post-it notes with scribbles of positivity —…

1 day ago

Column | In the blink of an eye, in the click of a shutter

During my first year of college, I kept a daily question journal. Every day, I…

3 days ago