Categories: Archives

Free speech is vital, even in high school

When high school students step off the street and onto school property, they leave certain… When high school students step off the street and onto school property, they leave certain rights behind. Free speech, for example, is limited for students if their speech is distracting, and understandably so. But while at home – or online – students are free to speak their minds without worrying about punishment from school authorities.

If someone had explained this to administrators of Pittsburgh’s Keystone Oaks School District two years ago, they would be better off financially.

The school district has recently agreed to pay $60,000 in damages and attorney fees to former student Jack Flaherty, who is now a sophomore at Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Like most settlements and lawsuit penalties these days, the Flaherty settlement is a large amount of money awarded under the vague category of “damages.” Although it may be outrageous, it is an appropriate response to the school district’s actions.

In March 2001, the school discovered that Flaherty, then a varsity volleyball player, had posted four messages from his home computer on an Internet bulletin board dedicated to Western Pennsylvania High School Volleyball. Most of the messages on the board are described as “trash talk” between opposing players. One of Flaherty’s messages was directed toward an opposing player whose mother is employed by Keystone Oaks. Flaherty’s message said the player’s mother was a “bad art teacher.”

When the school found out about the message, it responded harshly, kicking Flaherty off the volleyball team, barring him from attending after-school events, and denying him access to any of the school’s computers.

The ACLU took Flaherty’s case before U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose, who ordered the immediate reinstatement of Flaherty’s privileges. But instead of allowing him back on the volleyball team, Keystone Oaks canceled its entire volleyball season.

While Flaherty probably did not endure $60,000 worth of damage, the school district certainly earned its punishment. The notion that the administration’s power extends into students’ homes is ridiculous, and the decision to disobey a federal judge by punishing the entire volleyball team is deplorable.

If Keystone Oaks has a bad art teacher, its administration is far worse, and no student deserves punishment for saying so.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Students gear up, get excited for Thanksgiving break plans 

From hosting a “kiki” to relaxing in rural Indiana, students share a wide scope of…

21 hours ago

Photos: Pitt Women’s Basketball v. Delaware State

Pitt women’s basketball defeats Delaware State 80-45 in the Petersen Events Center on Wednesday, Nov.…

22 hours ago

Opinion | Democrats should be concerned with shifts in blue strongholds

Recent election results in such states have raised eyebrows nationwide, suggesting a deeper shift in…

1 day ago

Editorial | Trump’s cabinet picks could not be worse

Over the past week, President-elect Donald Trump began announcing his nominations for Cabinet secretaries —…

1 day ago

What Trump’s win means for the future of reproductive rights 

Pitt professors give their opinions on what future reproductive health care will look like for…

1 day ago

Police blotter: Nov. 8 – Nov. 20

Pitt police reported one warrant arrest for indecent exposure at Forbes and Bouquet, the theft…

1 day ago