Categories: Archives

Student Government Board elections code may change

Pending a vote next week, the Student Government Board’s elections code may become more… Pending a vote next week, the Student Government Board’s elections code may become more explicit about candidate and campaign protocol.

At Tuesday night’s SGB meeting in Nordy’s Place, Kari Rosenkaimer, chair of the Elections Committee, announced a proposal to add provisions to the elections code that would disallow a candidate who had been found guilty of certain crimes from running for SGB.

“We want students who are in good standing with the University,” Rosenkaimer said.

If the vote passes, students guilty of theft, assault, perjury or any violation of the academic integrity code will not be eligible to run for any SGB office. Also, if a student is guilty of multiple violations of the judicial code, removal from the ballot at the discretion of the elections chair may occur.

In the past, the elections chair would review the application and choose to either deny or approve the applicant. Now, the decision will be more objective, as students will automatically be removed from the running if they are guilty of the listed infractions or if they fail to disclose the information in their application.

Rosenkaimer also proposed restrictions on where students can “chalk.” The restrictions, if passed, will limit the spots where SGB candidates can write messages in chalk. They will be limited to areas that can be washed clean by rain or snow, such as sidewalks. The walls of campus buildings will be off limits.

There are currently no restrictions on where candidates can write in chalk.

At next week’s meeting, the Board members will also vote on a proposal that, if passed, would curtail the ability of slates to work together in an election. The candidates make up their election slate with three potential board members or two board members and a presidential candidate. The proposal does not include specific changes to the elections code, which governs SGB elections.

Currently, slates are allowed to verbally and electronically endorse each other. However, they are not allowed to officially run together.

Rosenkaimer said that by eliminating the ability of slates to work together, they would not be able to dominate an election, but she said, “we are trying to tread lightly on this issue.”

On the upcoming November ballot, students will have the option to vote for a referendum that will allow voters to vote for eight board members and a president in future elections instead of the current five-member voting limit.

In the unfinished business segment of the meeting, board members split in a 4-4 vote to make the “ad hoc” governmental and environmental committees permanent standing committees. The motion needed a two-thirds vote to pass, and the issue was tabled.

Prior to the vote, Board member Ryan Gayman said the group had a deep discussion on the issue.

“It was a philosophical look at the organization and how it will affect future boards,” Gayman said.

SGB president Molly Stieber utilized the president’s remarks segment of the meeting to voice her thoughts on the matter.

“There is no question that the environmental and governmental committees have done great things for the 2011 board,” she said.

Moving forward with his initiative to add more general education courses, Board member Alex Zimmerman announced that the History of Sports course will count toward the historical change general education requirement.

Check out the Allocations notes online.

Allocations

Panther Judo was approved $1,897.05 and denied $218.35 for a regional competition at West Point.

Panther Judo requested $4,256 for three hotel rooms and transportation to a competition. The Board approved $2,382 and denied $1,874 for one hotel room, individual registration fees and additional transportation.

The Allocations Committee approved $450.90 for the Pitt Roller Hockey Club.

The Board approved $933 to send members from Pitt Open Books to a national conference.

The Allocations Committee approved the Scientists, Engineers, and Mathematics for Service request for $192.17 in full.

The Allocations Committee approved Zisha’s request for $462.08 in full.

Women’s Ultimate Frisbee requested a $1,234.32 budget modification that would allow the group to participate in a tournament at Penn State University, and the request was approved in full.

Panthers 4 Israel requested $1450. The request was postponed one week because no representative from the group attended the meeting.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Pitt Faculty Union votes to ratify first labor contract with university

After more than two years of negotiations with the University and nearly a decade of…

3 days ago

Senate Council holds final meeting of semester, recaps recent events

At the last Senate Council meeting of the semester, Chancellor Joan Gabel discussed safety culture…

5 days ago

Op-Ed | An open letter to my signatory colleagues and to the silent ones

In an open letter to the Chancellor published on Apr. 25, a group of 49…

2 weeks ago

Woman dead after large steel cylinder rolled away from Petersen Events Center construction site

A woman died after she was hit by a large cylindrical steel drum that rolled…

2 weeks ago

Pro-Palestinian protesters gather on Pitt’s campus, demand action from University

Hundreds of student protesters and community activists gathered in front of the Cathedral of Learning…

3 weeks ago

SGB releases statement in support of Pitt Gaza solidarity encampment

SGB released a statement on Sunday “regarding the Pitt Gaza solidarity encampment,” in which the…

3 weeks ago