News

Pitt faculty union, administration dispute bargaining unit size

Nearly two months into contract negotiations between faculty union representatives and University officials, the union claims that Pitt seeks to unlawfully disqualify 600 members while failing to substantively engage in the bargaining process. 

“It is difficult to imagine a charitable interpretation of this behavior,” the union’s bargaining committee wrote in a May 12 letter to colleagues. 

The union’s outcry follows the fifth session of what will likely be a more than yearlong bargaining process. Administration has put forth only one written proposal, the union said, compared to 11 from the bargaining committee on issues ranging from health and safety to academic freedom and faculty governance.

A Pitt spokesperson told the University Times that officials want to “clarify” the size of the bargaining unit before forging ahead with negotiations and their lone proposal lacks the “intent or effect of excluding 600 faculty members from the unit.” 

“As the University explained to the union bargaining committee, the intent of the proposal was to clarify which positions are specifically covered by the [Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board] certification language and related order, which are at times ambiguous or contradictory,” the Pitt spokesperson said. 

Any changes to the unit must first be approved by the PLRB, which certified the union’s landslide victory in October. It’s unclear which faculty positions are in dispute. 

The bargaining unit’s size was a frequent sticking point between union organizers and the University leading up to the election. The University submitted an eligibility list with more than 4,000 members three years ago that nearly nixed the union drive altogether. A Pitt News investigation found that the list included hundreds of administrators and departed faculty, and a PLRB hearing examiner later trimmed the list by nearly 400 names, allowing organizers to cross the 30% support threshold to trigger an election. 

The parties engaged in further disputes pre-election over incorporating the School of Medicine in the bargaining unit, but the PLRB ultimately decided to exclude medical school faculty. 

Even with their contentious history over the size of the bargaining unit, the University said it remains committed to “good faith” negotiations, and the union emphasized a “constructive” approach in their letter. 

“We will continue to offer responsible, lawful, evidence-based proposals, and to give the administration every opportunity to engage with this process,” the letter said. “We will continue to stand together against any attempts to divide us.”

newsdesk

Share
Published by
newsdesk

Recent Posts

SGB hears fiscal year 2025 budget requests

During its weekly meeting on Tuesday at Nordy’s Place, the Student Government Board reviewed proposals…

1 day ago

Students bracing for political tension during Thanksgiving break 

Students are, by and large, excited to return home to spend time with family during…

1 day ago

Pitt sounds airhorns as crows migrate to campus

Crow populations have increased significantly in recent months due to the birds’ migration to Pittsburgh.…

1 day ago

University Gamelan Ensemble explores music, culture and creativity at Bellefield Hall concert

The University of Pittsburgh Gamelan Ensemble played at the Bellefield Hall Auditorium on Nov. 18th,…

2 days ago

Photos: University Gamelan Ensemble

Pitt’s Gamelan Ensemble performs in Bellefield Hall on Monday, Nov. 18.

2 days ago

Opinion | The best ways to make the most of the holiday season

From baking treats to ice skating in the cold weather, there is so much to…

2 days ago