Opinions

Editorial | House GOP is endangering civil rights, liberties by disbanding subcommittee

At the end of January, the GOP-controlled House Oversight and Accountability Committee leaders disbanded the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Subcommittee. Following this decision, some House Democrats expressed concern, saying “GOP Oversight⁩ tried to toss out the Civil Rights Subcommittee without anybody noticing.”

The Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties oversaw issues related to voting rights, equal employment, criminal justice reform policies and legislative and oversight jurisdiction over the Census Bureau and the Census, among other important rights. Unfortunately, word of the decision wasn’t heavily publicized until recently. 

The release of the graphic video showing Tyre Nichols’ death at the hands of the Memphis police came shortly before the panel was dismantled. Democrats, and even Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, have drawn attention to the incident.

Greene, also a member of the Oversight and Accountability Committee, said Nichols’ death was tragic but that she doubted it was a civil rights issue. She then shifted the attention off of Nichols and onto Capitol rioter Ashli Babbitt, who was killed during the insurrection, almost as to say the two incomparable deaths are akin to each other.

After the Oversight Committee terminated the subcommittee, Chairman James Comer said “Let me be very clear — any topic that’s not mentioned in the subcommittee jurisdiction is reserved for the full committee. We can have a committee hearing in this committee on basically anything we want.”

While Comer makes a valid point, it does not remedy eliminating a subcommittee dedicated to protecting the most vulnerable people who have been historically mistreated — and continue to face discrimination and oppression today. Also, by not allocating special time and resources to investigating civil rights and civil liberties — especially within a committee slated to review “40 or 50 different things” — efforts to address any infringements will most likely fall to the wayside. 

Rep. Jasmine Crockett introduced an amendment that would reinstate the subcommittee and “show the American people what this committee stands for.” Crockett’s proposal to reinstate the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Subcommittee was one of six amendments Democrats proposed, all of which were voted down on party lines and ultimately died in the hands of the GOP-controlled House. 

The decision to dissolve the subcommittee is chalked up to “efficiency, effectiveness and accountability,” but in a nation that does not have a positive track record when it comes to the protection and granting of civil rights, reinstating the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Subcommittee is in the best interest of efficiency, effectiveness and accountability. It’s unethical for a largely white, male legislature to make this “reckless and cruel” decision on behalf of underrepresented minorities.

opinionsdesk

Share
Published by
opinionsdesk

Recent Posts

Porch roof collapse injures dozens during party on Semple Street

The roof of a porch on Semple Street collapsed during a St. Patrick’s Day celebration…

2 hours ago

A Good Hill to Die On // Break It Down

In this release of “A Good Hill to Die On,” I dive deep into the…

8 hours ago

Who Asked? // Does growth only “count” if it’s quantifiable?

This installment of Who Asked? by staff writer Brynn Murawski wonders why it feels like…

8 hours ago

“They’re throwing trans people under the bus”: Counseling center faces backlash after event name change 

On Feb. 24, Pitt’s Counseling Center faced backlash after briefly renaming an event from "LGBT…

11 hours ago

Q&A: Meet the 2024-2025 SGB president and vice president 

SGB announced the 2024-2025 election results at their meeting on Tuesday. The Pitt News spoke…

11 hours ago

Editorial | Pitt Administration must listen to its students’ electoral demands

The passing of these referendums does not guarantee a future Pitt with these policies. Merely,…

20 hours ago