Uncategorized

Editorial | 3 candidates Michael Knowles wouldn’t debate

After transgender scholar Deirdre McCloskey dropped out of an on-campus debate against Michael Knowles, a conservative political commentator who has received enough attention on campus for a lifetime in the past few weeks, organizers for the event scrambled to find a replacement. 

Although the Intercollegiate Studies Institute found a new debate participant — someone who describes himself as a “libertarian-conservative journalist” — it’s unclear why a hateful and ignorant transphobe who calls for the eradication of “transgenderism” deserves a platform, especially considering the majority of Americans are in favor of protecting trans people from discrimination.

It’s a bit silly of Knowles to claim that his “opposition to transgenderism derives, not from hatred, but from love of the truth, in this case regarding epistemology and anthropology.” Last time we checked, anthropology is the study of the culture of people, and people have challenged and rejected the gender binary for thousands of years. 

It’s telling that nine transgender individuals rejected ISI’s offer to debate Knowles, even with $10,000 up for grabs. Here’s three others who Knowles wouldn’t debate, probably out of fear they’d make a compelling argument and crush his ego. 

  • Roc the Panther 

To Knowles’ dismay, gender is a social construct. And, sorry to break it to you, but that’s not even an opinion — it’s sort of an established fact, and one recognized by the World Health Organization. That being said, gender is concerned with people. 

While we think Roc could make a good argument for why we shouldn’t discriminate based on something forced onto us by society, Knowles wouldn’t be able to comprehend discussing gender with an animal mascot. This concept would prove far too confusing for his little brain to wrap around, so it’s safe to say Roc is in the clear! 

  • The Cathedral of Learning

Knowles, thinking he knows all, would absolutely refuse to entertain the Cathedral of Learning. I mean, can you blame him? It does have “learning” in the name, which seems above Knowles’ intellectual paygrade. Plus, most humanities majors are housed here, and there isn’t anything more terrifying than a 20-something obtaining a degree in gender, sexuality and women’s studies, so it’s safe to say that Cathy is off-limits. 

  • A random student off of the street 

What’s more terrifying than someone who believes in LGBTQ+ rights? Probably one who is actively in college and learning about the world, so Knowles most likely would not test his luck by plucking an unsuspecting student from the swarms of people traveling up and down Forbes and Fifth. 

With a growing number of young people concerned for LGBTQ+ rights, the chances are pretty high that he’d face someone who would make the argument that trans people deserve to exist, probably on the basis that they aren’t hurting anyone and simply want to live their most authentic lives.

opinionsdesk

Share
Published by
opinionsdesk

Recent Posts

Porch roof collapse injures dozens during party on Semple Street

The roof of a porch on Semple Street collapsed during a St. Patrick’s Day celebration…

22 hours ago

A Good Hill to Die On // Break It Down

In this release of “A Good Hill to Die On,” I dive deep into the…

1 day ago

Who Asked? // Does growth only “count” if it’s quantifiable?

This installment of Who Asked? by staff writer Brynn Murawski wonders why it feels like…

1 day ago

“They’re throwing trans people under the bus”: Counseling center faces backlash after event name change 

On Feb. 24, Pitt’s Counseling Center faced backlash after briefly renaming an event from "LGBT…

1 day ago

Q&A: Meet the 2024-2025 SGB president and vice president 

SGB announced the 2024-2025 election results at their meeting on Tuesday. The Pitt News spoke…

1 day ago

Editorial | Pitt Administration must listen to its students’ electoral demands

The passing of these referendums does not guarantee a future Pitt with these policies. Merely,…

2 days ago