News

What Trump’s win means for the future of reproductive rights 

Susan Frietsche, executive director and law attorney for the Women’s Law Project, said the future of reproductive rights across the country looks “really bad.”

“I don’t want to sugarcoat it,” Frietsche said. “We are in a moment of intense crisis and grave danger in reproductive health. There’s no denying that, but we also are not entirely powerless. What we will do [and] how we will respond over the next four years will matter immensely.”  

After Donald Trump’s victory, many people have questions about what the future looks like for reproductive rights. Although his policies on reproductive rights had been inconsistent throughout his campaign, Trump most recently said that abortion limits would be left to the states. In the past, House Republicans have endorsed a national abortion ban. Frietsche explained what reproductive rights look like in Pennsylvania right now and if change should be expected. 

“Abortion is legal and available in Pennsylvania,” Frietsche said. “And it will remain so for the foreseeable future. We just can’t trust [Trump’s] campaign promises. They have not been consistent, and I don’t know what the plan is among opponents of reproductive liberty. What I can say is that nothing has changed yet.”

With the Pennsylvania state legislature’s control split between Democrats and Republicans, Greer Donley, an associate professor of law who has been widely published in her works on abortion and other reproductive healthcare, said she thinks it’s “very unlikely that any new abortion laws are going to pass here.” However, she noted that Pennsylvania citizens have already had some difficulties accessing abortion care under the state’s current laws, such as requiring state-scripted counseling and implementing a 24-hour delay.

“In Pennsylvania, abortion is legal throughout until through 24 weeks of pregnancy and after that [in] rare circumstances,” Donley said. “But in those first 24 weeks, there’s a lot of hoops that people have to jump through to be able to get the abortion. So we’re not really a state that’s going to have the ability to repeal a clause, but on the other hand, we’re also not a state where you’re going to see a ban come into effect anytime soon.”

Jacqueline Ellison, assistant professor within the Department of Health Policy and Management, said that for many people, abortion care and contraception were inaccessible even under Roe v. Wade.

“In the time between Roe v. Wade and Dobbs v. Jackson, states enacted over 1000 laws that restricted access to abortion,” Ellison said. “Access to reproductive health in this country has always been hard for some people to access. But I think it’s not going to get better under the Trump administration.”

Ellison discussed how quickly the country might see a change in reproductive rights, although there is no definite path after this election. 

Under the last Trump administration, the [US Department of Health and Human Services] restricted funding to Title X facilities that were affiliated with abortion,” Ellison said. “The federal funding for facilities that might provide abortions was retrenched. So I think funding is something that can be relatively quick, but I think other things might take a bit longer.”

This November, seven states voted to take measures that will protect reproductive rights in their state constitutions. Ellison said Pennsylvania could possibly take the same steps in the future.

“Some states like Rhode Island voted to cover abortion care in the state Medicaid program using state-only funds,” Ellison said. “That’s an example of a protective policy that Pennsylvania could go for that would certainly improve access to reproductive health for people in the state.”

Although the results of this election aren’t what the people in the reproductive rights movement wanted, Donley said it doesn’t mean their “fight is over in any way.”

There’s a lot of open questions about what an incoming Trump administration will try to do,” Donley said. “But until they start doing that, I think a lot of the strategies are really the same, like focusing on state initiatives. The referendum was very successful. Many blue states have been able to repeal some of the unnecessary abortion regulations that they had [and] many of them passed shield laws.”

newsdesk

Share
Published by
newsdesk

Recent Posts

Opinion | Democrats should be concerned with shifts in blue strongholds

Recent election results in such states have raised eyebrows nationwide, suggesting a deeper shift in…

4 hours ago

Editorial | Trump’s cabinet picks could not be worse

Over the past week, President-elect Donald Trump began announcing his nominations for Cabinet secretaries —…

4 hours ago

Police blotter: Nov. 8 – Nov. 20

Pitt police reported one warrant arrest for indecent exposure at Forbes and Bouquet, the theft…

6 hours ago

Down to their last strike, Pitt men’s soccer’s No. 2 seeding provides new hope in the NCAA tournament

Now down to their last strike, the time has come for 2024 Pitt men’s soccer…

6 hours ago

Pitt’s winter sports well underway and preparing for holiday break contests

Wrestling Pitt wrestling (1-0, ACC 0-0) is in full swing and hosts Lehigh this Sunday,…

6 hours ago

NFL playoff predictions and the NBA’s breakout rookie star in this week’s Take Four

The Eagles could go all the way // Ashley O’Doherty, Staff Writer  After their dominant…

6 hours ago