To the Editor,
I found your editorial advising students to vote “against Ravenstahl”… To the Editor,
I found your editorial advising students to vote “against Ravenstahl” genuinely frightening. It actively promoted a short-sighted method of political action that is harmful to the whole political process.
It was right to show students that the election had deep consequences for us, but the article’s reasoning was limited to the view of one student who sees nothing beyond Oakland. Your argument against the $50 tax on students said nothing but that it would cost students money. Why exactly does Ravenstahl want to tax us? Where is the money going? In other words, is it worth it?
Along with knowing there are issues at our doorstep, students must act in a way that respects the fact that we are an intricate and integral part of the city, as a whole, and not just Oakland.
Brendan Sullivan
School of Arts and Sciences
From hosting a “kiki” to relaxing in rural Indiana, students share a wide scope of…
Pitt women’s basketball defeats Delaware State 80-45 in the Petersen Events Center on Wednesday, Nov.…
Recent election results in such states have raised eyebrows nationwide, suggesting a deeper shift in…
Over the past week, President-elect Donald Trump began announcing his nominations for Cabinet secretaries —…
Pitt professors give their opinions on what future reproductive health care will look like for…
Pitt police reported one warrant arrest for indecent exposure at Forbes and Bouquet, the theft…