Categories: Archives

Letter to the Editor 11/5

To the Editor,

I found your editorial advising students to vote “against Ravenstahl”… To the Editor,

I found your editorial advising students to vote “against Ravenstahl” genuinely frightening. It actively promoted a short-sighted method of political action that is harmful to the whole political process.

It was right to show students that the election had deep consequences for us, but the article’s reasoning was limited to the view of one student who sees nothing beyond Oakland. Your argument against the $50 tax on students said nothing but that it would cost students money. Why exactly does Ravenstahl want to tax us? Where is the money going? In other words, is it worth it?

Along with knowing there are issues at our doorstep, students must act in a way that respects the fact that we are an intricate and integral part of the city, as a whole, and not just Oakland.

Brendan Sullivan

School of Arts and Sciences

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Students gear up, get excited for Thanksgiving break plans 

From hosting a “kiki” to relaxing in rural Indiana, students share a wide scope of…

16 hours ago

Photos: Pitt Women’s Basketball v. Delaware State

Pitt women’s basketball defeats Delaware State 80-45 in the Petersen Events Center on Wednesday, Nov.…

16 hours ago

Opinion | Democrats should be concerned with shifts in blue strongholds

Recent election results in such states have raised eyebrows nationwide, suggesting a deeper shift in…

1 day ago

Editorial | Trump’s cabinet picks could not be worse

Over the past week, President-elect Donald Trump began announcing his nominations for Cabinet secretaries —…

1 day ago

What Trump’s win means for the future of reproductive rights 

Pitt professors give their opinions on what future reproductive health care will look like for…

1 day ago

Police blotter: Nov. 8 – Nov. 20

Pitt police reported one warrant arrest for indecent exposure at Forbes and Bouquet, the theft…

1 day ago