To the Editor,
I found your editorial advising students to vote “against Ravenstahl”… To the Editor,
I found your editorial advising students to vote “against Ravenstahl” genuinely frightening. It actively promoted a short-sighted method of political action that is harmful to the whole political process.
It was right to show students that the election had deep consequences for us, but the article’s reasoning was limited to the view of one student who sees nothing beyond Oakland. Your argument against the $50 tax on students said nothing but that it would cost students money. Why exactly does Ravenstahl want to tax us? Where is the money going? In other words, is it worth it?
Along with knowing there are issues at our doorstep, students must act in a way that respects the fact that we are an intricate and integral part of the city, as a whole, and not just Oakland.
Brendan Sullivan
School of Arts and Sciences
In an open letter to the Chancellor published on Apr. 25, a group of 49…
A woman died after she was hit by a large cylindrical steel drum that rolled…
Hundreds of student protesters and community activists gathered in front of the Cathedral of Learning…
SGB released a statement on Sunday “regarding the Pitt Gaza solidarity encampment,” in which the…
Around 80 protestors from the Pitt faculty union and United Steelworkers gathered outside of the…
Editor-in-chief Betul Tuncer reflects on the role of student journalists in society and says thank…