Categories: Archives

Film raises questions on No Child Left Behind

New York City student teacher turned filmmaker Lerone Wilson delves into the controversial No… New York City student teacher turned filmmaker Lerone Wilson delves into the controversial No Child Left Behind Act and its impact on America’s educational system in his 2005 documentary of the same name.

The Pitt Public Service Program and Student Volunteer Outreach sponsored a screening of Wilson’s documentary, “No Child Left Behind,” last Wednesday in David Lawrence Hall.

Eric Hartman – an instructor in the Public Service Program who helped organize the event – described the presentation as “an opportunity to see a documentary that I hope presents both sides of a debate on No Child Left Behind.”

Some students at the screening said the film didn’t pull them strongly to either side of the debate.

“It made me more confused,” senior Ashley McAdams said. “I had a negative opinion of the act, but now I’m a little more informed.”

Natalie Campbell, a Student Volunteer Outreach tutor, said, “I don’t feel the issue is any more resolved for me after watching the documentary, but maybe that will foster some more research.”

In sponsoring the screening, Pitt Public Service Program and Student Volunteer Outreach also hoped to illustrate the importance of one-on-one teaching to a child’s development and encouraged students to get involved in the tutoring programs.

Reflecting on her own experience tutoring Somalian refugees, Campbell said, “It’s really important to me that these children have a fair chance at education here in Pittsburgh. When it comes to being an [English as a Second Language] student dealing with emotional issues and discrimination, I think it’s important for Pittsburgh students to be the glue between school and community for these kids.”

In the documentary, a gap between affluent students and their poorer counterparts takes center stage in the criticism of No Child Left Behind, particularly its “one-size-fits-all” approach to enforcing educational standards through testing.

Critics of the act insist that it sets the bar high, but fails to provide schools with adequate funding to bridge the innate gap between richer and poorer children.

“My aunt is a teacher in a pretty bad area of Harrisburg, and [No Child Left Behind] pushes children onto the next grade even though she wants to hold them back, so it’s kind of like they’ll be left behind anyway,” junior Lauren Stoner said.

Of the experts interviewed in the documentary, both pro and con often expressed the same sentiment regarding No Child Left Behind: good intent, bad implementation.

Sophomore Sarah Rentz had a similar opinion.

“It’s easy to say it’s a bad program, but they had to do something because the U.S. is so below other countries in education,” Rentz said, “But when it’s all about testing, teachers miss out on other important things to focus on.”

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Trump wins second term, Republicans win big in Pennsylvania on Election Day

Donald Trump will become the 47th president of the United States after earning the necessary…

15 mins ago

Opinion | How did this happen?

Thomas and I spent most of the election night texting back and forth. We both…

7 hours ago

Opinion | Intimacy is not reserved for romantic relationships

Chances are, during college, you’re going to crash out over nothing and live in a…

7 hours ago

Sam Clancy: A guarantee on Pittsburgh’s Mount Rushmore

Pittsburgh is home to some of the most important figures in sports history –– so…

8 hours ago

‘I’ll get through these next four years’: Pitt students divided over Trump’s victory, with mixed emotions on campus

As the news echoes across campus, Pitt students are grappling with mixed emotions about the…

8 hours ago

Faculty Assembly discusses antisemitic violence on campus, announces antisemitic ad-hoc committee 

On Wednesday, Nov. 6., Faculty Assembly reflected on the 2024 presidential election, addressed recent acts…

8 hours ago