Categories: Archives

Fahrenheit 9/11 is not a campaign ad

Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore recently won the highest honor at the 57th… Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore recently won the highest honor at the 57th Cannes Film Festival. His movie then went on to generate $21.8 million in its first three days, becoming the first documentary ever to debut as Hollywood’s top weekend film. But “Fahrenheit 9/11” and its director may not be able to advertise his work on television or radio after July 30.

Conservative groups, including Citizens United, filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission calling for an examination of the film’s ads for potential violations of the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law, which prohibits corporate-funded ads that identify a federal candidate 30 days before a primary or 60 days before general election.

Under media exemption, members of the press may discuss political candidates freely before an election. Does a documentary qualify for a media exemption? Well, yeah.

Moore is an artist, not a politician. While people may disagree with his art, it is art, and therefore should not be subject to government censorship. Almost all art has some politics attached to it. But this movie is not a campaign ad — it’s a movie. It does not endorse any candidate. All Moore said he wanted to do was impact the election in November. And any statement made is a statement that Moore is allowed to make.

The FEC can’t restrict any ads that do not mention Bush’s name. But since “Fahrenheit 9/11” is about Bush, it would be rather difficult for audiences to know what the film is about without mentioning him in the ads.

Does the FEC really want to set a precedent by restricting artists from promoting their work? That would sure make the government appear petty, partisan and rather stupid.

In the end, The Federal Election Commission might take months to issue a ruling on the complaint, making it unlikely the commission would act in time to affect the film’s ad campaign. So, what is the point? All the controversy has only helped to raise awareness about the already controversial documentary. And Moore has already thanked his opponents for that.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Students gear up, get excited for Thanksgiving break plans 

From hosting a “kiki” to relaxing in rural Indiana, students share a wide scope of…

12 hours ago

Photos: Pitt Women’s Basketball v. Delaware State

Pitt women’s basketball defeats Delaware State 80-45 in the Petersen Events Center on Wednesday, Nov.…

12 hours ago

Opinion | Democrats should be concerned with shifts in blue strongholds

Recent election results in such states have raised eyebrows nationwide, suggesting a deeper shift in…

21 hours ago

Editorial | Trump’s cabinet picks could not be worse

Over the past week, President-elect Donald Trump began announcing his nominations for Cabinet secretaries —…

21 hours ago

What Trump’s win means for the future of reproductive rights 

Pitt professors give their opinions on what future reproductive health care will look like for…

23 hours ago

Police blotter: Nov. 8 – Nov. 20

Pitt police reported one warrant arrest for indecent exposure at Forbes and Bouquet, the theft…

23 hours ago