Categories: Archives

It’s not Google’s fault that hate sells

The Internet’s leading search engine — and one of the English language’s newest verbs — is… The Internet’s leading search engine — and one of the English language’s newest verbs — is embroiled in controversy over offensive search results.

Google “Jew” and the top search result is a Web site called Jewwatch.com, a clearinghouse of anti-Semitic information and links. Despite pressure from advocacy groups to remove the site from its listings, Google is not changing the results.

The only time Google changes its search results is when the sites advocate illegal actions, such as pedophilia, as in the case of a site called “Chester’s guide to molesting young girls,” which came up second on searches on the English city of Chester.

Google works by implementing complex algorithms based on the number and quality of links to a given site — the sites with the best and most other links on the Web rank highest in the listings. Asking Google to remove this particular site — odious as it may be — is unfair and wrongheaded.

If Google removes the site from the listings, it will set a dangerous precedent based on advocacy rather than relying on its consistent, mathematical criteria. Every Web site has an equal and fair chance to get listed high on Google — each site can improve its content and visibility in its own way. This should inspire Jewish-positive sites to double their efforts to spread their messages by having more sites link to theirs.

No one — no one sane, anyhow — is disputing that the site is hateful and wrong. However, we live in a society based upon certain freedoms; among them is the freedom of speech. The site is terrible, but Google is performing its function perfectly by ranking it first — the site gets hits and is linked to. Google’s job is to rank the Web, not perform judgment calls upon its content.

Depending upon how the matter is considered, it is a good thing that Jewwatch.com is first — it draws attention to how pervasive such disgusting sentiments are, and could have a galvanizing effect on those who would change that fact.

Google is the leading search engine because it is consistent. The results are reliable and without bias. The search engine is beyond reproach in this unfortunate situation.

Anyone with an objection needs to understand who is to blame. Google isn’t responsible for anti-Semitism. No one who isn’t already anti-Semitic will be swayed into hating Jews just because Google’s first option is Jewwatch.com.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Porch roof collapse injures dozens during party on Semple StreetPorch roof collapse injures dozens during party on Semple Street

Porch roof collapse injures dozens during party on Semple Street

The roof of a porch on Semple Street collapsed during a St. Patrick’s Day celebration…

2 hours ago
A Good Hill to Die On // Break It DownA Good Hill to Die On // Break It Down

A Good Hill to Die On // Break It Down

In this release of “A Good Hill to Die On,” I dive deep into the…

8 hours ago
Who Asked? // Does growth only “count” if it’s quantifiable?Who Asked? // Does growth only “count” if it’s quantifiable?

Who Asked? // Does growth only “count” if it’s quantifiable?

This installment of Who Asked? by staff writer Brynn Murawski wonders why it feels like…

8 hours ago

“They’re throwing trans people under the bus”: Counseling center faces backlash after event name change 

On Feb. 24, Pitt’s Counseling Center faced backlash after briefly renaming an event from "LGBT…

11 hours ago

Q&A: Meet the 2024-2025 SGB president and vice president 

SGB announced the 2024-2025 election results at their meeting on Tuesday. The Pitt News spoke…

11 hours ago

Editorial | Pitt Administration must listen to its students’ electoral demands

The passing of these referendums does not guarantee a future Pitt with these policies. Merely,…

19 hours ago