Categories: Archives

Limbaugh inappropriate, uninformed

We all knew it was coming. Rush Limbaugh, former commentator on ESPN’s “Sunday NFL… We all knew it was coming. Rush Limbaugh, former commentator on ESPN’s “Sunday NFL Countdown” said something insensitive, displayed his astounding lack of football knowledge and, resultantly, resigned from the show on Oct. 2.His remarks concerned three-time pro-bowler Donovan McNabb, quarterback for the Philadelphia Eagles. “The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well … he got a lot of credit … that he didn’t deserve.”

Commenting on a player’s performance is legitimate. Commenting a player’s race, as a means of discounting his performance, is not, and Limbaugh’s comments were severely out of line.

Limbaugh may not have intended to make racist comments; he remarked in a statement that they “were not racially motivated.”

But accidental racism is still racism. Remember, these remarks come from a man who once said on his show, “Have you ever noticed how all newspaper composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?”

Obviously, Limbaugh has issues with minorities. And putting him in a setting where he is discussing athletes from all different racial and cultural backgrounds invited controversy – though that seems to be what ESPN wanted.

Football – like all sports – relies on statistics to track exactly how far its players run and throw, and how much they win. By taking these quantifiable things into account, commentators can distinguish a good player from a bad one. This is not to say that football is without racial politics – but ideally, it shouldn’t be.

What Limbaugh said was reprehensible, and he was right in quitting.

Moreover, ESPN had no business putting someone so far removed from sports on a sports show. If the station wanted better ratings, it should have invested in people with actual sports expertise, rather than a man with an inflated ego and little to say about sports.

If everyone were to follow this poorly set model, Ann Coulter would be hosting Trading Spaces, and Michael Moore commenting on dog racing.

Sports has its share of controversy, without actively seeking it. Would it have been so hard to find an actual commentator – one with qualifications other than playing football in high school? Why turn the camera on someone who really has nothing to say, and does so in the most offensive way possible?

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Opinion | How did this happen?

Thomas and I spent most of the election night texting back and forth. We both…

5 hours ago

Opinion | Intimacy is not reserved for romantic relationships

Chances are, during college, you’re going to crash out over nothing and live in a…

5 hours ago

Sam Clancy: A guarantee on Pittsburgh’s Mount Rushmore

Pittsburgh is home to some of the most important figures in sports history –– so…

6 hours ago

‘I’ll get through these next four years’: Pitt students divided over Trump’s victory, with mixed emotions on campus

As the news echoes across campus, Pitt students are grappling with mixed emotions about the…

6 hours ago

Faculty Assembly discusses antisemitic violence on campus, announces antisemitic ad-hoc committee 

On Wednesday, Nov. 6., Faculty Assembly reflected on the 2024 presidential election, addressed recent acts…

7 hours ago

DePasquale, Democrat watch party brings feelings of optimism in the community

A watch party held at the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers for Pennsylvania attorney general candidate…

7 hours ago