Categories: Archives

Patriotism in schools shouldn’t be legislated

United States District Judge Robert F. Kelly signed an order last month overruling an act… United States District Judge Robert F. Kelly signed an order last month overruling an act passed in Pennsylvania in December that required all students and teachers in the state to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance or to sing the national anthem every morning. Under the act, any student who refused faced suspension, a letter home or both.

Requiring students to say the Pledge or sing the anthem runs contrary to the principles that both represent in the first place. The United States was founded on the notions of free speech and the right to disagree and dissent. A fundamental aspect of free speech is the right to not speak – to not participate in the rituals that define patriotism. Any measure that runs counter to free speech runs counter to patriotism – if patriotism is defined as love of the principles this country was founded on, the principles that set it apart and make it great.

Enforcing a rule that requires a middle- or high-school student – the most sleep-deprived and surly species on the planet – to stand and recite a pledge or sing a difficult song first thing in the morning is ridiculous.

The kid in question could be abstaining for any number of apolitical reasons. Perhaps her thoughts are elsewhere. Maybe his voice is breaking and trying to hit the high notes of the anthem – in public – is the worst form of public humiliation imaginable.

There are legitimately political reasons, too, that don’t have anything to do with being a junior member of a terrorist network. The national anthem is a bellicose song, glorifying “the rockets’ red glare,” and “the bombs bursting in air.” A patriotic pacifist could certainly object to these lyrics.

What about exchange students? Should we expect a visitor from Japan to stand and pledge allegiance to a country in which she is merely a guest? That hardly seems fair, and suspending such a student certainly won’t do any good for America’s image abroad.

Teachers have enough to worry about. Many local districts are on the verge of labor strikes and walkouts, funding is perilously tight, and the threat of violence is ever-present. With so much to worry about – and we haven’t even begun wondering if Johnny can read – it’s too much to ask of our teachers to police the utterances of every kid, every morning. Sending letters home isn’t free – taxpayers have to pay for the postage – and suspension breeds resentment in students.

Judge Kelly is to be highly commended for standing against a rising tide of nationalism in schools. Of all the issues facing schools today, this trivial attempt to legislate patriotism upon students should be the last that any teacher needs to address.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Trash turns to treasure at Text & conText Lab’s ‘Junk Journal Journey’

Students who walked into the Text & conText Lab on Wednesday afternoon were able to…

1 day ago

Pitt men’s soccer defeats Cornell, proceeds to Round of 16

On Sunday night, No. 2 seed Pitt mens’ soccer (13-5-0) defeated Cornell (13-4-2) 1-0 in…

1 day ago

A chat with the Pitt Volleyball icon Cat Flood

On this episode of “The Pitt News Sports Podcast,” assistant sports editor Matthew Scabilloni talks…

3 days ago

Meaning at the Movies | My Old Heart & “My Old Ass”

In this edition of “Meaning at the Movies,” staff writer Lauren Deaton explores how the…

3 days ago

A Good Hill to Die On // What I Am Really Thankful For

This edition of “A Good Hill to Die On” confronts rising pressures even with the…

3 days ago

Don’t Be a Stranger | Tiny Beautiful Things

In this edition of Don’t Be a Stranger, staff writer Sophia Viggiano discusses the parts…

3 days ago