Categories: Archives

Court right in affirmative action ruling

Two days ago, the U.S. Supreme Court held affirmative action – programs that take race into… Two days ago, the U.S. Supreme Court held affirmative action – programs that take race into account as a consideration, but not a deciding factor, in college admissions – to be constitutional.

In a 5-4 judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that the University of Michigan law school could continue such a program. In a related case concerning UMich’s undergrad program, the Supreme Court decided that point systems were unconstitutional. UMich had a system that automatically awarded black students 20 points out of the 100 necessary for admission.

Colleges should be allowed to favor certain factors, including those beyond the applicant’s control. Affirmative action, as part of a thorough review of applications, can work to promote racial – as well as geographic and economic – diversity.

The admissions process, when dealing with qualities that cannot be quantified, should not be mechanized. Given the overall increase in college and graduate applications, time needs to be allotted to review all applicants – beyond their test scores and grades.

Admissions should be based not on what applicants have done, but on what applicants might do. Universities should not dissociate numbers from people, forgetting that they are admitting students and not statistics.

Affirmative action seeks to fix disparities in opportunities. That said, it should be a finite program, one that becomes unnecessary as other areas of the education system are fixed. This reflects that true change takes generations, and that measures must be taken to remedy current inequalities.

Racial inequality is not solely an issue facing higher education, though colleges seem to draw the most fire. Addressing this, Pitt filed a friend-of-the-court brief affirming that diversity should be a priority. In a press release, Pitt commended the decision, calling diversity “a crucial component of a premier education.”

Pitt can benefit from the confirmation of affirmative action. The law school and the undergraduate College of Arts and Sciences both hover around 15 percent minorities, according to a Fall 2002 head count. Though these numbers do not reflect local minority percentages, Pitt should dedicate itself to making their admissions process as equitable as possible.

Affirmative action acts as a means to get the desired end: a diverse and interesting student body.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Trash turns to treasure at Text & conText Lab’s ‘Junk Journal Journey’

Students who walked into the Text & conText Lab on Wednesday afternoon were able to…

1 day ago

Pitt men’s soccer defeats Cornell, proceeds to Round of 16

On Sunday night, No. 2 seed Pitt mens’ soccer (13-5-0) defeated Cornell (13-4-2) 1-0 in…

1 day ago

A chat with the Pitt Volleyball icon Cat Flood

On this episode of “The Pitt News Sports Podcast,” assistant sports editor Matthew Scabilloni talks…

3 days ago

Meaning at the Movies | My Old Heart & “My Old Ass”

In this edition of “Meaning at the Movies,” staff writer Lauren Deaton explores how the…

3 days ago

A Good Hill to Die On // What I Am Really Thankful For

This edition of “A Good Hill to Die On” confronts rising pressures even with the…

3 days ago

Don’t Be a Stranger | Tiny Beautiful Things

In this edition of Don’t Be a Stranger, staff writer Sophia Viggiano discusses the parts…

3 days ago