Categories: Archives

Editorial: Candidates take backseat to referendum on election day

The Pitt News Editorial Board declines to endorse the presumptive winner of the Student Government Board Presidency, Mike Nites. This is not because of his lack of qualifications or proposals, but because overlooking a much larger issue at hand in this editorial would be a disservice to the Pitt student body.

Due to the small field of candidates entered in this year’s election, all but two of the candidates will earn seats on the Board come January. Though students may feel discouraged by the small field of candidates, ignoring the online ballot entirely today is an unwise move.

During this election, students have the ability to make a decision that could potentially make the selection process for Board members more accessible to a wider range of candidates.

Through a decision by the SGB Constitutional Review Committee, a referendum has been included on the ballot that, if passed, would reduce the number of candidates for which students could vote from six to four. These four votes would include three for Board members and one for president.

Some may argue that the limiting of votes creates an inherently undemocratic process.

As it currently stands, however, the voting system does not lend itself to creating a diverse Board. Having the ability to vote a majority onto the Board will only heighten the likelihood of the same student groups — often those who market themselves as megaslates, whether explicitly or implicitly — sitting on the Board.

This is problematic for a healthy student democracy.

Students must seriously consider the referendum and support this concrete step in making a change to how our student government representatives are elected to their positions.

This referendum correctly acknowledges that the current system is flawed, but changes should not stop here.

Independent candidates are disadvantaged under the current system, and will continue to be disadvantaged should the four-person voting structure pass through. Uninformed or indifferent voters are more likely to vote for an entire slate because they appear as neat packages of three candidates. This lends itself to voting for entire slates and a presidential candidate.

Until students voice their support of a complete election process overhaul and call for a predominantly independent-candidate campaign structure, the four-vote structure will take a positive step toward a more diverse and deserving Board.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Sam Clancy: A guarantee on Pittsburgh’s Mount Rushmore

Pittsburgh is home to some of the most important figures in sports history –– so…

22 mins ago

‘I’ll get through these next four years’: Pitt students divided over Trump’s victory, with mixed emotions on campus

As the news echoes across campus, Pitt students are grappling with mixed emotions about the…

26 mins ago

Faculty Assembly discusses antisemitic violence on campus, announces antisemitic ad-hoc committee 

On Wednesday, Nov. 6., Faculty Assembly reflected on the 2024 presidential election, addressed recent acts…

29 mins ago

DePasquale, Democrat watch party brings feelings of optimism in the community

A watch party held at the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers for Pennsylvania attorney general candidate…

31 mins ago

Police blotter: Nov. 1 – Nov. 6

Pitt police reported theft by deception at The Eatery, graffiti at the Allegheny Observatory and…

31 mins ago

Blood in the water: How ‘Sharks’ became the symbol of Pitt Football

One of the biggest factors in Pitt football’s early success in 2024 is the outstanding…

42 mins ago