Categories: Archives

Racetrack should be built without mining

In order to cash in on the slot machines that the State Legislature may or may not legalize… In order to cash in on the slot machines that the State Legislature may or may not legalize at racetracks, the city wants to build a horse-racing track on an area in Hays overlooking East Carson Street.

Mayor Tom Murphy advocates clearing this area by allowing a Beaver County developer to go forth with his proposed plan – peeling rock, soil and trees off, excavating coal found there via strip mining and leveling it for development.

Although this project, should it be approved, would be overseen by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, the environmental impact of this action would not justify the limited returns reaped by the city.

Charles Betters, the developer, wants to strip mine the area in a process that would remove 13 million cubic yards of earth, according to a June 3 article in the Post-Gazette.

The area in question was previously the site of a coal mine. Betters plans to tap into the remaining coal seam. In addition, he proposed remedying problems left behind by the other mining companies, such as extinguishing an underground mine fire and filling polluted mine shafts. There are also plans for a 200-acre park surrounding the area.

These measures are not enough to quash concerns surrounding strip mines. Coal mining of any sort entails environmental problems: sulfuric acid runoff into surrounding rivers, erosion when root systems are removed and pollutants leaking into groundwater.

Murphy supports the plan, saying it would garner revenue for the city. These revenues would be temporary, as the mine would be filled in after the coal was excavated. Also, should mines produce runoff or erosion, the city might have to shoulder the clean-up cost, which would consume the revenues collected.

The racetrack, and the possibility of the slot machines, would be the city’s main benefit from the mine. Building a track is already a risk – public interest could make or tank the track, making it a revenue source or drain. Moreover, it would be in direct competition with established tracks, both in- and out-of-state.

The mine would benefit the company, not Pittsburgh. Jobs would be temporary and workers could be imported from outside of the state.

On top of taking an economic gamble on the racetrack, this city could suffer severe environmental damage to its landscape and waterways. Strip mining pits finance against environmentalism, with the former winning. Murphy should end his support of this plan and the planned track should move elsewhere.

Pitt News Staff

Share
Published by
Pitt News Staff

Recent Posts

Opinion | How did this happen?

Thomas and I spent most of the election night texting back and forth. We both…

6 hours ago

Opinion | Intimacy is not reserved for romantic relationships

Chances are, during college, you’re going to crash out over nothing and live in a…

6 hours ago

Sam Clancy: A guarantee on Pittsburgh’s Mount Rushmore

Pittsburgh is home to some of the most important figures in sports history –– so…

7 hours ago

‘I’ll get through these next four years’: Pitt students divided over Trump’s victory, with mixed emotions on campus

As the news echoes across campus, Pitt students are grappling with mixed emotions about the…

7 hours ago

Faculty Assembly discusses antisemitic violence on campus, announces antisemitic ad-hoc committee 

On Wednesday, Nov. 6., Faculty Assembly reflected on the 2024 presidential election, addressed recent acts…

7 hours ago

DePasquale, Democrat watch party brings feelings of optimism in the community

A watch party held at the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers for Pennsylvania attorney general candidate…

7 hours ago