Off the wire: Despite experts, mad cow not real threat

By JAMES MOON

(U-WIRE) LOS ANGELES – On Dec. 23, 2003, a dark day for cattle farmers all over the United… (U-WIRE) LOS ANGELES – On Dec. 23, 2003, a dark day for cattle farmers all over the United States, a single Holstein cow from Canada via Washington was diagnosed with mad cow disease. The dreaded ailment (bovine spongiform encephalopathy, for South-Campus types) had arrived in America. Mad cow has become the disease of the moment. And while some would have Americans turn away from red meat altogether for greener pastures, the truth is somewhat less disconcerting: There is no mad cow scare, only scare tactics.

You can’t turn on the television anymore without an “expert” telling you about some doomsday scenario involving BSE. Activist (and vegetarian) Michael Greger has already dubbed BSE the “plague of the 21st century.” Former cattle rancher (and current vegetarian) Howard Lyman has compared BSE to AIDS in terms of destructive potential. Add in some dramatizations of how BSE has a nasty tendency to leave its victim’s brain with spongy-looking holes, and let mass panic ensue.

The threat of BSE has been exaggerated to a point where even the most carnivorous of Americans may begin to question their Double-Double-eating ways. And why shouldn’t they? The country is already acting on fear. Leaders in this crusade, such as Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, have been up in arms demanding mandatory BSE testing for every cow killed in the United States (all 35 million of them), no matter how costly or unnecessary it may be.

In the meantime, meat-vending establishments all over the country are trying to distance themselves from the Washington slaughterhouse for fear of losing business. Even the UCLA dining halls have posted disclaimers to ease student concerns about its beef.

As hard as it is to believe, all this is the result of one cow. There is only one case of an actual person diagnosed with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (the human version of BSE) in the United States – and that person contracted the disease during her stay in England. Is it not possible that we might be overreacting just a little? For example, there have only been 153 vCJD deaths worldwide, somewhat short of an AIDS-scale epidemic.

It’s a sad reflection of society that hysterical fears have come to overshadow facts, which clearly speak for themselves. First of all, the proteins or prions responsible for BSE can be found mainly in the nervous system of cows and cows alone. While it is possible that stray proteins may find their way into your steak in the slaughterhouse, there is still little reason for concern. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention places the odds of contracting vCJD, even after eating a contaminated piece of meat, at one in 10 billion. Your chances are better for winning the lottery. As the USDA Food Safety Inspection Service has been saying, there is “virtually zero risk” of getting mad cow disease in the United States.

It boggles the mind how this “better-safe-than-sorry” attitude for a non-problem has spread so quickly. Regulations, such as the proposed testing of all cows for BSE, may make you feel better about the non-threat, but they come at a cost. And countries like Japan and South Korea are refusing American beef exports, further hurting the $40 billion industry. How far will this madness continue in order to placate unfounded fears?

We’re a country full of Atkins dieters and Big Mac-eaters. Most of the people warning of the proposed dangers of red meat are more interested in preaching the wonders of a beefless lifestyle. Moral, ethical and health issues aside, the future of beef consumption in the United States should not be complicated by scare tactics. When it comes down to it, as the secretary of agriculture has said: “Beef is absolutely safe to eat.”